Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents | |
---|---|
State parties to the convention (members of the HCCH)
State parties to the convention (non-members of the HCCH)
|
|
Signed | 5 October 1961 |
Location | The Netherlands |
Effective | 14 January 1965 |
Condition | ratification by 3 states[1] |
Parties | 97 |
Depositary | Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Netherlands) |
Languages | French (prevailing in case of divergence) and English |
The Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement for Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents, the Apostille convention, or the Apostille treaty is an international treaty drafted by the Hague Conference on Private International Law. It specifies the modalities through which a document issued in one of the signatory countries can be certified for legal purposes in all the other signatory states. Such a certification is called an apostille (French: certification). It is an international certification comparable to a notarisation in domestic law.
Contents |
Apostilles are affixed by Competent Authorities designated by the government of a state which is party to the convention.[2] A list of these authorities is maintained by the Hague Conference on Private International Law. Examples of designated authorities are embassies, ministries, courts or (local) governments. For example, in the United States, the Secretary of State of each state and his or her deputies are usually competent authorities. In the United Kingdom, all apostilles are issued by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in Milton Keynes.[3]
To be eligible for an apostille, a document must first be issued or certified by an officer recognised by the authority that will issue the apostille. For example, in the US state of Vermont, the Secretary of State maintains specimen signatures of all notaries public, so documents that have been notarised are eligible for apostilles.[4] Likewise, courts in the Netherlands are eligible of placing an apostille on all municipal civil status documents directly. In some cases, intermediate certifications may be required in the country where the document originates before it will be eligible for an apostille. For example, in New York City, the Office of Vital Records (which issues, among other things, birth certificates) is not directly recognised by the New York Secretary of State.[5] As a consequence, the signature of the City Clerk must be certified by the County Clerk of New York County to make the birth certificate eligible for an apostille.[6][7]
The apostille itself is a stamp or printed form consisting of 10 numbered standard fields. On the top is the text APOSTILLE, under which the text Convention de La Haye du 5 octobre 1961 (English: Hague Convention of 5 October 1961) is placed. In the numbered fields the following information is added:
The information can be placed on the (back of the) document itself, or attached to the document as an allonge.
Four types of documents are mentioned in the convention:[1]
States that have not signed the Convention must specify how foreign legal documents can be certified for its use. Two countries may have a special convention on the recognition of each other's public documents, but in practice this is infrequent. When such a convention is lacking, as is normally the case, the document must be certified by the foreign ministry of the country where the document originated and then by the foreign ministry of the government where the document will be used; one of the certifications will often be performed at an embassy or consulate. In practice this means the document must be certified twice before it can have legal effect in the receiving country. For example, as a non-signatory, Canadian documents for use abroad must be certified by the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs in Ottawa or by a consular official abroad and subsequently by the relevant government office or consulate of the receiving state.
Apostille vs. Legalization | |||||||||
|
The convention is in force for all members of the European Union and all but 10 members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law. The next countries to accede to the convention are Kyrgyzstan, Costa Rica and Oman, for which the treaty will enter into force on 31 July, 14 December 2011 and 30 January 2012 respectively.
State | Entry into Force | Apostille not recognized in |
comment |
Albania | May 9, 2004 | Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy and Spain |
|
Andorra | December 31, 1996 | ||
Antigua and Barbuda | November 1, 1981 | ||
Argentina | February 18, 1988 | ||
Armenia | October 14, 1994 | ||
Australia | March 16, 1995 | ||
Austria | January 13, 1968 | ||
Azerbaijan | March 2, 2005 | Germany | |
Bahamas | July 10, 1973 | ||
Barbados | November 30, 1966 | ||
Belarus | May 31, 1992 | ||
Belgium | February 9, 1973 | ||
Belize | April 11, 1993 | ||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | March 6, 1992 | ||
Botswana | September 30, 1966 | ||
Brunei | December 3, 1987 | ||
Bulgaria | April 29, 2001 | ||
Cape Verde | February 13, 2010 | ||
Colombia | January 30, 2001 | ||
Cook Islands | April 30, 2005 | ||
Costa Rica | December 14, 2011 | ||
Croatia | December 8, 1991 | ||
Cyprus | April 30, 1973 | ||
Czech Republic | March 16, 1999 | ||
Kingdom of Denmark | December 26, 2006 | does not apply for Greenland and the Faroe Islands |
|
Dominica | November 3, 1978 | ||
Dominican Republic | August 30, 2009 | Austria, Belgium,Germany and the Netherlands |
|
Ecuador | April 2, 2005 | ||
El Salvador | May 31, 1996 | ||
Estonia | September 30, 2001 | ||
Fiji | October 10, 1970 | ||
Finland | August 26, 1986 | ||
France | January 24, 1965 | ||
Georgia | May 14, 2007 | Greece | |
Germany | February 13, 1966 | ||
Greece | May 18, 1985 | ||
Grenada | April 7, 2002 | ||
Honduras | December 30, 2004 | ||
Hong Kong | April 25, 1965 | The convention is still applicable to Hong Kong despite the transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong on July 1, 1997.[8] |
|
Hungary | January 18, 1973 | ||
Iceland | November 27, 2004 | ||
India | July 14, 2005 | Germany | |
Ireland | March 9, 1999 | ||
Israel | August 14, 1978 | ||
Italy | February 11, 1978 | ||
Japan | July 27, 1970 | ||
Kazakhstan | January 30, 2001 | ||
Kyrgyzstan | July 31, 2011 | ||
Latvia | January 30, 1996 | ||
Lesotho | December 4, 1966 | ||
Liberia | February 8, 1996 | Belgium, Germany and the United States |
|
Liechtenstein | September 17, 1972 | ||
Lithuania | July 19, 1997 | ||
Luxembourg | June 3, 1979 | ||
Macau | February 4, 1969 | The convention is still applicable to Macau despite the transfer of sovereignty over Macau on December 20, 1999.[8] |
|
Macedonia | November 17, 1991 | ||
Malawi | December 2, 1967 | ||
Malta | March 3, 1968 | ||
Marshall Islands | August 14, 1992 | ||
Mauritius | March 12, 1968 | ||
Mexico | August 14, 1995 | ||
Moldova | March 16, 2007 | Germany | |
Monaco | December 31, 2002 | ||
Mongolia | December 31, 2009 | Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany and Greece |
|
Montenegro | June 3, 2006 | ||
Namibia | January 30, 2001 | ||
Netherlands | October 8, 1965 | Aruba, Curaçao, Netherlands and Sint Maarten |
|
New Zealand | November 22, 2001 | ||
Niue | March 2, 1999 | ||
Norway | July 29, 1983 | ||
Oman | January 30, 2012 | ||
Panama | August 4, 1991 | ||
Peru | September 30, 2010 | Germany and Greece | |
Poland | August 14, 2005 | ||
Portugal | February 4, 1969 | ||
Romania | March 13, 2001 | ||
Russia | May 31, 1992 | ||
Saint Kitts and Nevis | December 14, 1994 | ||
Saint Lucia | July 31, 2002 | ||
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | October 27, 1979 | ||
Samoa | September 13, 1999 | ||
San Marino | February 13, 1995 | ||
São Tomé and Príncipe | September 13, 2008 | ||
Serbia | April 27, 1992 | ||
Seychelles | March 31, 1979 | ||
Slovakia | February 18, 2002 | ||
Slovenia | June 25, 1991 | ||
South Africa | April 30, 1995 | ||
South Korea | July 14, 2007 | ||
Spain | September 25, 1978 | ||
Suriname | November 25, 1975 | ||
Swaziland | September 6, 1968 | ||
Sweden | May 1, 1999 | ||
Switzerland | March 11, 1973 | ||
Tonga | June 4, 1970 | ||
Trinidad and Tobago | July 14, 2000 | ||
Turkey | September 29, 1985 | ||
Ukraine | December 22, 2003 | ||
United Kingdom | January 24, 1965 | including Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories |
|
United States | October 15, 1981 | ||
Vanuatu | July 30, 1980 | ||
Venezuela | March 16, 1999 |
The Apostille does not give information regarding the quality of the document, but certifies the signature (and the capacity of who placed it) and correctness of the seal/stamp on the document which must be certified. In 2005 The Hague Conference surveyed its members and produced the a report in December 2008 which expressed serious concerns about Diplomas and Degree certificates, titled "THE APPLICATION OF THE APOSTILLE CONVENTION TO DIPLOMAS INCLUDING THOSE ISSUED BY DIPLOMA MILLS". The possible abuse of the system was highlighted "Particularly troubling is the possible use of diploma mill qualifications to circumvent migration controls, possibly by potential terrorists." (page 5) The risk comes from the fact that the various government stamps give the document an air of authenticity without anyone having checked the underlying document. "An official looking certificate may be issued to a copy of a diploma mill qualification, and then subsequently issued with an Apostille, without anyone having ever verified the signature on, let alone the contents of, the diploma." (page 7) Further member states indicated "they would be obliged to issue an Apostille for certification of a certified copy of a diploma issued by a diploma mill". (page 15) The Hague Conference expressed concern as to whether this issue could impact the entire convention. "…the Apostille does not 'look through the certification' and does not relate to the diploma itself …. There is a clear risk that such practices may eventually undermine the effectiveness and therefore the successful operation of the Apostille Convention". (page 5)[9]
In February 2009 the Hague Conference decided to amend the wording on the Apostille to make it clear that no one was checking whether the document being attested was genuine or a fake. The new wording to be used was as follows. "This Apostille only certifies the signature, the capacity of the signer and the seal or stamp it bears. It does not certify the content of the document for which it was issued."[10]